Is LT+ 2.0 Live safe or not?

HomeForumsGeneral DiscussionIs LT+ 2.0 Live safe or not?

This topic has 9 voices, contains 28 replies, and was last updated by avatar idiom444 2267 days ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 29 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
2011-09-30 at 09:24PM UTC #1400
avatar
Spikemonkey

C4eva stated in plain English on IRC that XGD3 rips with LT+ 2.0 are going to be just as Live safe as XGD2 rips as long as they are properly formated. Now the NFO on the new XGD3 rips from RROD sday they are in no way Live safe. Do I trust them, or the man himself? I would just like to kniow if I need to hook up another 360. Thanks.

2011-09-30 at 09:46PM UTC #1407
avatar
QuickMythril

he said “xgd3 backup is as safe as any backup can be,passing all their checks”. i take that to mean, ANY backup is not safe, because ap25 checks or other measures could be taken at any time by microsoft. they could force tiny stealth update everytime you go online if they wanted, so you always take a risk. i think he is saying “there is still a minimal risk, as always”. that was just a comment to appease the crowd until a more in depth explanation could be written.

2011-10-01 at 02:00AM UTC #1435
avatar
Spikemonkey

Well, the man himself just said that it is all good and the NFO is wrong. I take my info straight from the source. I am satisfied.

2011-10-01 at 03:22AM UTC #1438
avatar
jlogan2042

Yeah, I was really worried after reading the RROD NFO file. However, just look at c4eva’s latest responses on here.

As of right now the xgd3 backups pass every test. Its almost the same situation as with xgd2.. We can only be safe on Live until they change the system.

Right now it seems that these backups are fine. They do, however, seem to open up several doors for a potential ban wave. Just keep checking this site…xbox-scene..and other places and stay in the loop.

For now…bring on LT+ 2.0… I will keep rolling the dice.

2011-10-01 at 06:58AM UTC #1442
avatar
QuickMythril

he said he doesn’t agree with what’s in the rrod nfo, so i feel safe, if he feels it is safe enough to release and call safe

2011-10-01 at 10:06AM UTC #1458
avatar
Mclane

If you look in the ‘I’m sick of hearing’ thread I’ve added the exact comments made by the man himself from the IRC logs. If he says that in the state it is that its safe then I trust him!

If checks change then of course like any other FW it will need an update, that’s the price for paying nothing for the game. You have to remember that as risky as I think it is you still are one step ahead of a jtag box for once.

2011-10-01 at 12:17PM UTC #1463
avatar
handsomeking718

Why do people question c4eva dude,that kinda pisses me off,the man has been doing this for a very long time now.

The day he starts working for m$, then you guys should ask if the firmware is safe or not :D

2011-10-01 at 12:44PM UTC #1464
avatar
twisted247

how do we go from stressing good complete rips to its ok to boot a bad rip and 4 all u kiddies who cant remember 09 1 million box banned using 1.61 stealthed firm and others as well all made by c4eva then i still trusted him but know with peeps treating him as god and tx paying him. money is a motivator and i respect the scene and tx / c4eva . but dancing around the question of live safe is wrong its not safe.and they know it. checks could already be in place and if not there will be . if the gxd3 couldnt be done guess whos pocket book would take a hit? as they got products that depend on this working. how does it go from good rips important to these bad rips r as good as all the rest its bs m$ had ap.25 long befor they used it long before . c4eva + tx =$$$ rrod ripping team has no reason to post lies there covering there asses cause as with 09 ban wave c4eva and others first pointed towards the rips. AT WITCH POINT CAME THE BIG EMPHASIS ON RIPPING GAME DATA CORRECTLY!! SO WHATS CHANGED WITH MORE SECURITYON NEW DASH. PLEASE C4EVA HELP ME TO UNDERSTAND THIS AS IT MAKES NO SENCE. i am sorry if this offends any of u guys but just want the truth not buying products or even wasting time with this bs as it will be a ban wave with this method

2011-10-01 at 12:51PM UTC #1465
avatar
twisted247

this is to handsomeking 718 ur a noob and a idiot for not questioning him is he going to buy u a new box no was u around in 09 those of us who was and lost boxes and support the scene with donations have a right to question things u prick go play with ur dumie proof wanna be a modder tool “x360usbpro” and wait for the firm u cock jockey

2011-10-01 at 12:59PM UTC #1466
avatar
QuickMythril

i don’t think ixtreme 1.61 was stealth because after that was 1.7 which receieved the title LT. I remember LT being called stealth firmware. i trust c4e because i’m sure he did all kinds of testing with the current dashboard. now if there is a system update and everyone updates and starts using it before c4e gets a chance to check it out, that’s when it is stupid to trust blindly in the safety of these discs. he says it is fine for now, it passes all the checks, in otherwords there isn’t anything that the xbox does YET that will give away that it is a backup and not an original. even when they made the ap2.5 games people were failing those checks because they didn’t follow instructions, but microsoft couldn’t prove that the xval flag wasn’t just caused by a scratched disc. so i don’t think there are going to be anymore ban waves. they still want and get lots of money from people who are playing backups online.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 29 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.